Patient-Defined Goals and Preferences Among Adults With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Patient preferences (quantity vs quality of life; present vs future health) have not been investigated in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The goal of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate patient values toward treatment goals and competing health outcomes among adults with NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with well-differentiated, grade 1 or 2, advanced NETs starting a new systemic therapy completed 4 tools: (1) Health Outcomes Tool, which ranks the importance of 4 outcomes (survival, function/independence, freedom from pain, freedom from symptoms); (2) Attitude Scale, which identifies the extent to which patients agree with statements related to health outcomes; (3) Now versus Later Tool, which ranks the relative importance of quality of life (QoL) now versus 1 and 5 years from now; and (4) Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire, which identifies the amount of information the patient prefers to receive about their disease and treatment, the patient's treatment goal, the patient's perception of the physician's treatment goal, and self-reported health status. RESULTS: We recruited 60 patients with NETs (50.0% aged ≥65 years; 96.7% with stage IV disease). Primary tumor locations included the gastrointestinal tract (41.7%), pancreas (30.0%), and lung (21.7%). A plurality of patients reported maintaining independence as their most important health outcome (46.7%), followed by survival (30.0%), freedom from pain (11.7%), and freedom from symptoms (11.7%). A total of 67% of patients agreed with the statement, "I would rather live a shorter life than lose my ability to take care of myself"; 85.0% agreed with the statement, "It is more important to me to maintain my thinking ability than to live as long as possible." When asked to choose between current QoL versus QoL 1 year or 5 years in the future as more important, 48.3% and 40.0% of patients valued their QoL 1 year and 5 years in the future, respectively, more than their current QoL. Only 51.7% of patients believed their physician's treatment goals aligned with their own. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with NETs strongly value independence over survival. More communication between patients with NETs and their physicians is needed to ensure that patient preferences are incorporated into treatment plans.

Feasibility and Satisfaction of Using NET VITALS Self-assessment Tool Among Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors.

OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of effective patient education regarding diagnosis/treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), possibly related to their rare incidence. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey study, NET patients attending the 2019 Annual Los Angeles NET Education Conference were approached to complete NET VITALS, a self-assessment tool gauging patients' perception/awareness of their NET diagnosis/treatment, and a satisfaction survey. Feasibility of NET VITALS, patient satisfaction with NET VITALS, and patients' perception/awareness of their NET diagnosis/treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: This analysis included 68 patients (median age, 63 years; 47.1% gastrointestinal NETs; 88.2% metastatic disease). Participation was 88.3% (68/77), with a median of 85.7% of items completed (range, 61.9%-100.0%). More than 30% of the patients answered "Don't know/Not familiar"/left blank questions related to tumor characteristics, years of symptoms, and liver-directed therapies. In addition, 69.5% of the patients did not feel sufficient information about NETs was provided at diagnosis. Overall, 67.8% of the patients felt that NET VITALS provides topics to discuss with providers and 76.3% would recommend NET VITALS to others. CONCLUSIONS: NET VITALS is a feasible and acceptable self-assessment tool to potentially help patients improve communication about their NET diagnosis/treatment with their physician. Further studies will examine NET VITALS' generalizability and discuss its incorporation into clinical care.

Risk Factors for Hospitalizations Among Older Adults with Gastrointestinal Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Older adults (≥65 years) with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers who receive chemotherapy are at increased risk of hospitalization caused by treatment-related toxicity. Geriatric assessment (GA) has been previously shown to predict risk of toxicity in older adults undergoing chemotherapy. However, studies incorporating the GA specifically in older adults with GI cancers have been limited. This study sought to identify GA-based risk factors for chemotherapy toxicity-related hospitalization among older adults with GI cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary post hoc subgroup analysis of two prospective studies used to develop and validate a GA-based chemotherapy toxicity score. The incidence of unplanned hospitalizations during the course of chemotherapy treatment was determined. RESULTS: This analysis included 199 patients aged ≥65 years with a diagnosis of GI cancer (85 colorectal, 51 gastric/esophageal, and 63 pancreatic/hepatobiliary). Sixty-five (32.7%) patients had ≥1 hospitalization. Univariate analysis identified sex (female), cardiac comorbidity, stage IV disease, low serum albumin, cancer type (gastric/esophageal), hearing deficits, and polypharmacy as risk factors for hospitalization. Multivariable analyses found that patients who had cardiac comorbidity (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.13-5.42) were significantly more likely to be hospitalized. CONCLUSION: Cardiac comorbidity may be a risk factor for hospitalization in older adults with GI cancers receiving chemotherapy. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to examine the relationship between GA measures and hospitalization in this vulnerable population.

Understanding the Management and Treatment of Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Clinician's Guide to a Complex Illness.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are rare neoplasms that arise in the neuroendocrine cells of the pancreas. Although their clinical presentations differ depending on cell type, most are indolent, whereas others cause noteworthy hormone-related symptoms. The increasing incidence of PanNETs, attributed to improved diagnostic modalities, demonstrates advances in current standard of care. However, given the heterogeneity of these tumors, treatment decisions can become complex and an individualized approach is often required. Surgical intervention has remained the mainstay for localized tumors, whereas systemic therapies remain viable options for patients with unresectable or metastatic disease. Liver-directed therapies such as radiofrequency ablation and hepatic arterial embolization have also become available adjunct therapies for patients with liver-predominant metastases. Despite the increase in the armamentarium of treatment options for patients with PanNETs, data regarding the ideal sequence of treatment, especially systemic treatments, are currently lacking. Ongoing clinical trials are aimed at addressing this knowledge gap in addition to developing the next generation of novel therapeutics.

The utility of "low current" stimulation threshold of intraoperative electromyography monitoring in predicting facial nerve function outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a prospective cohort study of 103 large tumors.

To investigate the predictive utility of stimulation threshold (ST) of intraoperative electromyography monitoring for facial nerve (FN) outcomes among vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients postoperatively. The authors enrolled 103 unilateral VS patients who underwent surgical resection into a prospective cohort observational study from January 2013 to April 2015 in our hospital. ST values were used to categorize 81 patients into the "low current" (ST ≤ 0.05 mA) group and 22 patients into the control (ST > 0.05 mA) group. The FN function outcomes were summarized and correlated with these two groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Binary regression analysis revealed that the percentage of "good" FN outcome, defined by House-Brackmann (HB) classification of facial function (I-II), in the "low current" group was significantly higher than that of the control group (42.0 vs. 4.5% at 1 month, P = 0.015; 64.2 vs. 31.8% at 3 months, P = 0.024; 72.8 vs. 40.9% at 6 months, P = 0.021; 84.0 vs. 45.5% at 12 months, P = 0.002). Ordinal regression analysis showed that the distribution of HB scores was shifted in a favorable direction in the "low current" group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. For patients with HB IV at the first month postoperative period, the recovery rate of the "low current" group was significantly higher than that of control group (P = 0.003). "Low current" can predict FN function outcomes better and has faster recovery rates than that of the control group.